Hingham – Counter Point: The Borowski-Gate-Shooting Ghost Alive …

All Hingham police officers who were employed during, the now infamous, Borowski shooting know about the fraud and cover-up, to protect a Hingham Police officer and his pension. One was asked, prior to his retirement, why didn’t he speak up? His answer: “he wasn’t asked by the prosecutor”.

Yet this former police officer, et al was in possession of who, what, when and where about the cover-up and the fraudulent manufactured facts – which were presented to, the then, prosecutor. The result was the same as any other fabricated fantasy designed to punish the innocent and exonerate the truly guilty – in this case, may be, Borowski, the Hingham Police Officers who knew it was wrong, and those who planned and participated in the actual cover-up. We Understand that Borowski is still alive.

Maybe time has mellowed his untruthfulness and he will make it easy on the “new and improved” prosecutors? Maybe he won’t. It would go much easier on him if he did.

************
IS THIS NATIONWIDE OR JUST IN HINGHAM?
U.S.

judges see ‘epidemic’ of prosecutorial misconduct in state
By Maura Dolan1 Los Angeles Times

“The hearing seemed largely routine until a state prosecutor approached the lectern. Deputy Atty. Gen.

Kevin R. Vienna was there to urge three judges on the U.S.

9th Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold murder convictions against Johnny Baca for two 1995 killings in Riverside County. Other courts had already determined that prosecutors had presented false evidence in Baca’s trial but upheld the verdicts anyway.

Vienna had barely started his argument when the pummeling began. Judge Alex Kozinski asked Vienna if his boss, Atty. Gen.

Kamala D. Harris, wanted to defend a conviction “obtained by lying prosecutors.” If Harris did not back off the case, Kozinski warned, the court would “name names” in a ruling that would not be “very pretty.” Judge Kim Wardlaw wanted to know why Riverside County prosecutors presented a murder-for-hire case against the killer but did not charge the man they said had arranged the killings.

“It looks terrible,” said Judge William Fletcher. The January hearing in Pasadena, posted online2 under new 9th Circuit policies, provided a rare and critical examination of a murder case in which prosecutors presented false evidence but were never investigated or disciplined. The low-profile case probably would have gone unnoticed if not for the video, which attorneys emailed to other attorneys and debated on blogs.

In a series of searing questions, the three judges expressed frustration and anger that California state judges were not cracking down on prosecutorial misconduct. By law, federal judges are supposed to defer to the decisions of state court judges. Prosecutors “got caught this time but they are going to keep doing it because they have state judges who are willing to look the other way,” Kozinski said.

Santa Clara University law professor Gerald Uelmen said the judges’ questions and tone showed they had lost patience with California courts. State judges are supposed to refer errant lawyers, including prosecutors, to the state bar for discipline, but they rarely do, Uelmen said. “It is a cumulative type thing,” Uelmen said. “The 9th Circuit keeps seeing this misconduct over and over again.

This is one way they can really call attention to it.” A 2010 report by the Northern California Innocence Project cited 707 cases in which state courts found prosecutorial misconduct over 11 years. Only six of the prosecutors were disciplined, and the courts upheld 80% of the convictions in spite of the improprieties, the study found….”

References

  1. ^ Maura Dolan (www.latimes.com)
  2. ^ posted online (www.youtube.com)

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *